Researchers, readers, and reporting guidelines: writing between the lines. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG et al. Quality of reporting of observational longitudinal research. Tooth L, Ware R, Bain C, Purdie DM, Dobson A. Bias in psychiatric case-control studies: literature survey. Lee W, Bindman J, Ford T, Glozier N, Moran P, Stewart R, Hotopf M. Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practice. Pocock SJ, Collier TJ, Dandreo KJ, de Stavola BL, Goldman MB, Kalish LA et al. Strength - ening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The randomized registry trial – the next disruptive technology in clinical research? N Engl J Med 2013 369:1579–81. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. Practical statistics for medical research. More than 50 ancillary guidelines tailored to specific needs are now available to assist authors in preparing successful articles on observational studies.Īltman DG. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement was the first guideline developed to identify the minimal information that should be included in articles reporting observational and epidemiological research. Publishing their results can be challenging for scientists and writers. Observational trials are a relevant part of clinical research.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |